Daftar Hotel - EVERY time there was conflict between religious communities, simultaneously with the same desire to create a revolving tolerance. What exactly is the meaning of tolerance itself? Tolerance, said Rainer Forst (Toleration, 2007), is the understanding that comes from the Latin word meaning tolerare home, approve, or suffer.
Hotel di Jakarta - Tolerance generally refers to the conditional admission or not to intervene against a variety of beliefs, actions, or practices that are considered wrong, but still can be approved. So, there is no prohibition or restriction. This can be exemplified when the country tolerate religious minorities.
Tolerance can only be realized when the group is more dominant (majority) gives the space a difference for minorities. Questions marked confidence in carrying out the uniqueness of worship have not been disturbed, let alone be confused with the various techniques of violence that abused the dignity of humanity.
This occurs because of differences in beliefs can not be incorporated into uniformity. Tolerance evidenced by the kesetujuan to accept the other party as a social entity that can not be subjugated in a claim of truth. Tolerance can be seen also when the majority of running his conviction not to interfere with the minority. Minorities at home to stay alive in their homes.
Tolerance also does not have a substantial meaning if not related to freedom. Piotr Jaroszynsky (Freedom and Tolerance, 2003) describes that the definition of tolerance began to blossom in the 17th century. Prior to that time, tolerance is associated with the virtue called perseverance. In a literal sense, tolerance is a physical fortitude. However, besides having a literal meaning, tolerance has a moral meaning, namely fortitude.
Gradation
In thinking Rainer Forst, tolerance has four conceptions. First, the conception pembolehan which means those who have the authority or the majority gives pembolehan on minorities to live according to his conviction on the condition of minorities receive the majority dominant position. Secondly, the conception of co-existence or living together that means that there is no longer a majority or minority because all are in the equality of power.
Third, the conception of honor that occur when each party to respect each other based on accepted norms equally and not memfavoritkan one community. Fourth, the conception of the award that means not just respect the other party but the difference was accepted as a valuable thing and still embraced by good reasons.
If observed clearly, the four concepts that show gradations. In the gradation Where is our nation? Presumably, even the lowest gradation, namely pembolehan, this country can not make it happen. Although minorities have received various conditions specified by the majority, tragically, a full treatment of prejudice and discrimination still takes place.
All this can happen because, besides the state does the omission of the violence that occurs in a minority, the state has a legal justification. This can be seen in the permit to build places of worship that are discriminatory. In addition, various local laws that bernapaskan value of a particular religion flare passed.
The way out which can be chosen in a complicated situation it is all religious people are treated equally as citizens. As noted Jurgen Habermas (Religious Tolerance-The Pacemaker for Cultural Rights, 2004), the unification of all citizens in the political culture of the same frame as a solution. Citizens are empowered with the same to develop a cultural identity and come up with their cultural uniqueness. But that can only happen if all citizens under the requirements that apply to all parties, ie, must understand to be a citizen of one and the same political community.
However, did the state treat all parties as equal citizens domiciled, irrespective of the majority with a minority? If it still continues to happen, what a waste we are talking about tolerance.
Hotel di Jakarta - Tolerance generally refers to the conditional admission or not to intervene against a variety of beliefs, actions, or practices that are considered wrong, but still can be approved. So, there is no prohibition or restriction. This can be exemplified when the country tolerate religious minorities.
Tolerance can only be realized when the group is more dominant (majority) gives the space a difference for minorities. Questions marked confidence in carrying out the uniqueness of worship have not been disturbed, let alone be confused with the various techniques of violence that abused the dignity of humanity.
This occurs because of differences in beliefs can not be incorporated into uniformity. Tolerance evidenced by the kesetujuan to accept the other party as a social entity that can not be subjugated in a claim of truth. Tolerance can be seen also when the majority of running his conviction not to interfere with the minority. Minorities at home to stay alive in their homes.
Tolerance also does not have a substantial meaning if not related to freedom. Piotr Jaroszynsky (Freedom and Tolerance, 2003) describes that the definition of tolerance began to blossom in the 17th century. Prior to that time, tolerance is associated with the virtue called perseverance. In a literal sense, tolerance is a physical fortitude. However, besides having a literal meaning, tolerance has a moral meaning, namely fortitude.
Gradation
In thinking Rainer Forst, tolerance has four conceptions. First, the conception pembolehan which means those who have the authority or the majority gives pembolehan on minorities to live according to his conviction on the condition of minorities receive the majority dominant position. Secondly, the conception of co-existence or living together that means that there is no longer a majority or minority because all are in the equality of power.
Third, the conception of honor that occur when each party to respect each other based on accepted norms equally and not memfavoritkan one community. Fourth, the conception of the award that means not just respect the other party but the difference was accepted as a valuable thing and still embraced by good reasons.
If observed clearly, the four concepts that show gradations. In the gradation Where is our nation? Presumably, even the lowest gradation, namely pembolehan, this country can not make it happen. Although minorities have received various conditions specified by the majority, tragically, a full treatment of prejudice and discrimination still takes place.
All this can happen because, besides the state does the omission of the violence that occurs in a minority, the state has a legal justification. This can be seen in the permit to build places of worship that are discriminatory. In addition, various local laws that bernapaskan value of a particular religion flare passed.
The way out which can be chosen in a complicated situation it is all religious people are treated equally as citizens. As noted Jurgen Habermas (Religious Tolerance-The Pacemaker for Cultural Rights, 2004), the unification of all citizens in the political culture of the same frame as a solution. Citizens are empowered with the same to develop a cultural identity and come up with their cultural uniqueness. But that can only happen if all citizens under the requirements that apply to all parties, ie, must understand to be a citizen of one and the same political community.
However, did the state treat all parties as equal citizens domiciled, irrespective of the majority with a minority? If it still continues to happen, what a waste we are talking about tolerance.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar